From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jablonski v. Bolt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 17, 1995
213 A.D.2d 982 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

March 17, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Glownia, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that Lori L. Jablonski (plaintiff) had not suffered a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). In response to defendant's motion, plaintiffs submitted the affidavit of Dr. Geraci, a specialist in spine and musculoskeletal disorders, who had treated plaintiff for two years. Dr. Geraci averred that plaintiff had suffered a permanent 50% loss of forward flexion and extension of the lumbar spine, a 25% loss in side-bending motions and a 25% loss of flexion and extension of the cervical spine. That evidence is sufficient to raise an issue of fact whether plaintiff suffered a serious injury (see, Bates v. Peeples, 171 A.D.2d 635; Lazarre v Kopczynski, 160 A.D.2d 772).


Summaries of

Jablonski v. Bolt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 17, 1995
213 A.D.2d 982 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Jablonski v. Bolt

Case Details

Full title:LORI L. JABLONSKI et al., Respondents, v. WILLIAM BOLT, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 17, 1995

Citations

213 A.D.2d 982 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 319

Citing Cases

Bradley v. Thomas

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiffs presented…

Mangano v. Sherman

He opined to a reasonable degree of medical certainty that plaintiff had suffered permanent limitations…