From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jabbour v. Finnegan's Moving Warehopuse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 12, 2002
299 A.D.2d 192 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2184

November 12, 2002.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered June 14, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

PAUL F. MCALOON, for plaintiffs-respondents.

JOHN P. BONANNO, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Buckley, J.P., Sullivan, Rubin, Friedman, Gonzalez, JJ.


The circumstantial evidence was sufficient to permit a jury to infer that defendant's employee cut the legs of a railing in order to facilitate the moving of furniture, and failed to replace the railing properly, thereby causing plaintiff to fall and injure himself (see Schneider v. Kings Highway Hosp. Ctr., 67 N.Y.2d 743, 744-745; Negri v. Stop and Shop, Inc., 65 N.Y.2d 625). Accordingly, there was a triable issue of fact as to whether defendant created the allegedly dangerous condition, and plaintiff was not required to prove that defendant had actual or constructive notice (see Martinez v. City of New York, 224 A.D.2d 242, 243).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Jabbour v. Finnegan's Moving Warehopuse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 12, 2002
299 A.D.2d 192 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Jabbour v. Finnegan's Moving Warehopuse

Case Details

Full title:HALIM JABBOUR, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. FINNEGAN'S MOVING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 12, 2002

Citations

299 A.D.2d 192 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
749 N.Y.S.2d 531