From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J. AND A. CORPORATION v. CASS

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1933
238 App. Div. 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

March, 1933.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.


Judgment of the County Court of Suffolk county unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. This court makes the following additional finding of fact: That on November 11, 1931, defendant Alice F. Cass executed an extension agreement whereby she stipulated that upon that date there was due and unpaid upon the bond and mortgage in question $2,500 principal and interest thereon from the 3d day of August, 1931, and the following conclusion of law: That by the execution of the extension agreement by defendant Alice F. Cass on November 11, 1931, she is estopped from asserting against this plaintiff that the mortgage is usurious.


Summaries of

J. AND A. CORPORATION v. CASS

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1933
238 App. Div. 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

J. AND A. CORPORATION v. CASS

Case Details

Full title:J. AND A. CORPORATION, Respondent, v. ALICE F. CASS, Appellant, and BANK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1933

Citations

238 App. Div. 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Citing Cases

Montague v. Bank for Savings in City of N.Y

The mentioned provision imports the qualities of a certificate of estoppel and carries with it the protection…

Hammelburger v. Foursome Inn

Although corporations normally cannot assert the defense of civil usury (see General Obligations Law, §…