From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

IVY v. OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE, INC.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Mar 6, 2006
NO. CV 05-0654 C (W.D. Wash. Mar. 6, 2006)

Opinion

NO. CV 05-0654 C.

March 6, 2006

Peter Moote WSBA, Counsel for Plaintiff, Freeland, WA.

Bryan P. Coluccio, Bryan P. Coluccio, WSBA, Local Counsel for Defendants, CABLE, LANGENBACH, KINERK BAUER, LLP, Seattle, Washington.


STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS


STIPULATION

To protect the confidentiality of information contained in documents produced and other information disclosed through discovery in this litigation, pursuant to CR 29 the parties stipulate as follows:

1. The term "discovery materials" shall mean documents produced under requests for production, responses to interrogatories, deposition testimony, and documents produced in response to a subpoena or agreed-upon exchange or release.

2. Any discovery materials that a party asserts contain confidential information, proprietary information, or information the disclosure of which will subject a party or other person to invasion of privacy interests or undue embarrassment, may be designed as "confidential" by the party supplying or authorizing the collection of the discovery materials. Produced copies of "confidential" documents shall be so stamped or otherwise marked and shall be produced in unredacted form. "Confidential" materials shall include but not be limited to proprietary business information, confidential medical information, and personal information concerning non-party employees. If there is an unresolved dispute over whether certain information is properly designated as "confidential," the dispute shall be resolved under applicable federal or local civil rules to compel or protect production of the information.

3. Absent a dispute over the propriety of the designation as "confidential," any discovery materials so designated shall be held confidential by the parties and their attorneys, including those persons assisting counsel in preparation of this litigation, and shall not be disclosed to any other person nor made use of for any other purpose except as necessary in the prosecution or defense of this lawsuit. This may include disclosure to expert witnesses or consultants retained to assist in preparation of this lawsuit or witnesses who will give testimony with regard to the confidential material. Confidential information under this Order may be disclosed to non-party witnesses and consultants only on a need-to-know basis and only then after they have been shown this Stipulation and Order and they have agreed in writing to be bound by its terms. A suitable confidentiality agreement is attached hereto.

4. Upon conclusion of the litigation, all copies or reproductions of discovery materials subject to this Order shall, upon the producing party's request, be returned to the party providing such discovery materials or destroyed, provided, that plaintiff shall not be required to return copies of personnel files concerning the plaintiff, or "confidential" documents contained therein. If, at the conclusion of the litigation, any party has a reasonable basis for retaining confidential documents or information, that party shall attempt to reach agreement with the producing party concerning the terms under which such document or information will be retained. If the parties are unable to reach agreement, the party seeking to retain the confidential information or document shall move the Court for an Order modifying this Order.

5. The provisions of the Order, insofar as they restrict the communication and use of certain discovery materials and the information contained therein, shall continue to be binding after the conclusion of this action, including appeals, if any. Parties agree not to use any such information and materials in subsequent litigation; except as may be ordered by the Court pursuant to a motion brought by the party seeking to use such information or materials.

6. This Order does not limit any right of any party to resist discovery or compel discovery with respect to any documents or other information under applicable court rules and law. It does not preclude any party from seeking or obtaining from the Court, on an appropriate showing, additional protections or an order compelling discovery pursuant to applicable court rules and law, including, without limitation, an order that documents or information should or should not be produced or discovered, or should not be kept confidential. Each party reserves the right to seek modification of this Protective Order.

7. This Stipulation shall not in any way constitute a waiver by any party of any objection as to the admissibility as evidence at trial of any document or information covered herein or of any right to contest any assertion or claim that the documents or other information constitutes trade secrets or privileged or confidential materials or information; provided, however, that the documents or information shall be treated as privileged and confidential unless and until otherwise determined by the Court or stipulated by the parties.

8. The parties agree to be bound and abide by the terms of this Stipulation in relation to any documents or materials that are exchanged or produced prior to entry of the Protective Order. Until the Protective Order is entered, said materials shall not be provided to any non-party.

ORDER

Based on the foregoing stipulation, it is so ordered.


Summaries of

IVY v. OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE, INC.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Mar 6, 2006
NO. CV 05-0654 C (W.D. Wash. Mar. 6, 2006)
Case details for

IVY v. OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE, INC.

Case Details

Full title:RACHEL IVY, Plaintiff, v. OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE, INC., a Delaware…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle

Date published: Mar 6, 2006

Citations

NO. CV 05-0654 C (W.D. Wash. Mar. 6, 2006)

Citing Cases

Sullivan v. Bank of Am. NA

"While the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do permit parties to be excused from certain discovery on the…

Rinehart v. Life Insurance Company of North America

's Mtn. 2:15-19; Dkt. No. 54]. Citing Ivy v. Outback Steakhouse, Inc, 2006 WL 3813555 (W.D. Wash. 2006),…