From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ITT Industrial Credit Co. v. Carpet Factory, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 26, 1976
230 S.E.2d 354 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

52696.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 22, 1976.

DECIDED OCTOBER 26, 1976.

Dismissal of appeal. Clayton State Court. Before Paul S. Weiner, Judge pro hac vice.

Lewis N. Jones, for appellant.

Watson, Brown, Foster Keller, John L. Watson, Jr., for appellees.


In dismissing this appeal the trial court found that the delay in transmitting the record to this court was inexcusable but did not make a finding that the delay was unreasonable. The Supreme Court held in Young v. Climatrol c. Corp., 237 Ga. 53 ( 226 S.E.2d 737) that the provision of the Appellate Practice Act authorizing the trial court to dismiss an appeal for delay (Code Ann. § 6-809 (b)), requires that two elements be present: One, that the delay was unreasonable and two, that it was inexcusable. Since no finding of unreasonableness was made, Young controls here and the judgment dismissing the appeal is reversed.

Judgment reversed. Clark and Stolz, JJ., concur.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 22, 1976 — DECIDED OCTOBER 26, 1976.


Summaries of

ITT Industrial Credit Co. v. Carpet Factory, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 26, 1976
230 S.E.2d 354 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

ITT Industrial Credit Co. v. Carpet Factory, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ITT INDUSTRIAL CREDIT COMPANY v. CARPET FACTORY, INC. et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Oct 26, 1976

Citations

230 S.E.2d 354 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
230 S.E.2d 354

Citing Cases

ITT Industrial Credit Co. v. Carpet Factory, Inc.

In a prior appearance of this case, we reversed the trial court's judgment dismissing the appeal for delay in…

ITT Industrial Credit Co. v. Burnham

When a transcript is not timely filed, it is within the authority of the trial court to dismiss an appeal for…