From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ishaq v. Batra

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 6, 1995
212 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 6, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The record reveals that the appellant's motion for leave to sue both the court-appointed receiver and Referee was properly denied by the Supreme Court. Contrary to the appellant's contention, we find no evidence that either of these officers was negligent or derelict in carrying out his duties as set forth in the respective orders of appointment.

We have examined the appellant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J.P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ishaq v. Batra

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 6, 1995
212 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Ishaq v. Batra

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD ISHAQ, Plaintiff, v. RAVI BATRA, Appellant, et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 6, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 837

Citing Cases

Schwartz v. Kurlander

The viability of the immunity defense should properly be litigated in the context of a motion to dismiss the…

Luciano v. Cypress Hills Cemetery

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion for…