From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Isham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 6, 2008
973 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 4D07-4920.

February 6, 2008.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; James W. McCann, Judge; L.T. Case No. 561991CF002505A.

James Robert Isham, Raiford, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


Affirmed. See Horner v. State, 617 So.2d 311 (Fla. 1993) (holding that statute precluding a gap in probationary split sentence does not prohibit a separation between incarceration and probation as to each case of a multiple-case sentence, but merely bars a period of freedom between portions of an overall sentence); Jackson v. State, 615 So.2d 850 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (holding that jail term for second count of two-count conviction, to be served between jail term and probationary period for first count, was not impermissible gap in sentencing, but merely interrupted probationary term).

STONE, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Isham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 6, 2008
973 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Isham v. State

Case Details

Full title:James Robert ISHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 6, 2008

Citations

973 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Citing Cases

Strole v. State

Affirmed. See Horner v. State, 617 So.2d 311 (Fla.1993); Crawley v. State, 787 So.2d 886 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001);…

Belitsos v. State

AFFIRMED. See Horner v. State, 617 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 1993); Isham v. State, 973 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 4th DCA…