From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Isaza v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 3, 1999
746 So. 2d 492 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 99-2327.

Opinion filed November 3, 1999.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(i) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Leonard E. Glick, Judge, L.T. No. 96-5708.

Clemente Isaza, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, GREEN and SHEVIN, JJ.


We reverse the order denying defendant's motion for post-conviction relief solely on the ground that defendant's plea was involuntary based on misadvice of counsel regarding the amount of time defendant would serve on the sentence imposed. See Rensoli v. State, 718 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). As the record does not conclusively refute defendant's claim, this cause is remanded for an evidentiary hearing pursuant to State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla. 1996).

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Isaza v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 3, 1999
746 So. 2d 492 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Isaza v. State

Case Details

Full title:CLEMENTE ISAZA, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 3, 1999

Citations

746 So. 2d 492 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Borrego v. State

The State properly concedes that the plea colloquy and record do not conclusively refute the appellant's…

Bell v. State

Under State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla. 1996), and the subsequent decisions interpreting it, defendant is…