From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Isaiah v. WHMS Braddock Hospital Corporation

United States District Court, D. Maryland
Aug 15, 2007
Civil No. JFM-07-622 (D. Md. Aug. 15, 2007)

Opinion

Civil No. JFM-07-622.

August 15, 2007


MEMORANDUM


Plaintiff instituted this action against the Board of Trustees of Western Maryland Health System, Inc., the Board of Trustees of WHMS Braddock Hospital Corporation, and the Board of Trustees of Cumberland Memorial Hospital Corporation ("the three Boards"). Defendants have moved to dismiss on the grounds that (1) to the extent that plaintiff is pursuing a claim under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act ("HCQIA"), his claim fails because there is no express or implied cause of action under the HCQIA amd (2) to the extent that plaintiff is pursuing a claim for breach of contract, his claim against the three Boards' fails because none of them had a contractual relationship with plaintiff.

Plaintiff responded to the motion to dismiss by (1) stating that he had not filed any claim under the HCQUIA, and (2) agreeing to amend his complaint to bring in the proper parties to the action. Plaintiff filed with his response an amended complaint dropping the three Boards as defendants and substituting two new defendants — WHMS Braddock Hospital Corporation and the Memorial Hospital and Medical Center of Cumberland, Inc. — in their stead.

Plaintiff's actions have caused an unusual procedural morass. Under the circumstances I have concluded that the cleanest and most expeditious route to follow is to grant the three Boards' motion to dismiss. The effect of this ruling is to dismiss this action. The ruling is, however, without prejudice to plaintiff filing a new action against the two defendants whom he has named in his Amended Complaint.

A separate order effecting the ruling made in this memorandum is being entered herewith.

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is, this 15th day of August 2007

ORDERED

1. Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted;

2. This action is dismissed as to the Board of Trustees of Western Maryland Health System, Inc., the Board of Trustees of WHMS Braddock Hospital Corporation, and the Board of Trustees of Cumberland Memorial Hospital Corporation for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and

3. This ruling is without prejudice to plaintiff filing a new action against WHMS Braddock Hospital Corporation and the Memorial Hospital and Medical Center of Cumberland, Inc.


Summaries of

Isaiah v. WHMS Braddock Hospital Corporation

United States District Court, D. Maryland
Aug 15, 2007
Civil No. JFM-07-622 (D. Md. Aug. 15, 2007)
Case details for

Isaiah v. WHMS Braddock Hospital Corporation

Case Details

Full title:ISAAC ISAIAH, M.D. v. WHMS BRADDOCK HOSPITAL CORPORATION, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, D. Maryland

Date published: Aug 15, 2007

Citations

Civil No. JFM-07-622 (D. Md. Aug. 15, 2007)

Citing Cases

Atta v. Nelson

Congress did not include an express private right of action under the HCQIA. See Westmoreland v. Pleasant…