From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Isaiah v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 30, 1988
522 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-1872.

March 30, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Lucie County; Rupert Jason Smith, Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Ellen Morris, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Deborah Guller, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Affirmed except that we reverse as to costs which were imposed pursuant to sections 960.20, 943.25 and 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985). In each instance costs were assessed without compliance with the constitutional requirements of notice and an opportunity to be heard mandated by the supreme court in Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984), and Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla. 1988). Reversal is without prejudice to the state's right to attempt to obtain a cost judgment after notice and hearing if it elects to do so.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Isaiah v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 30, 1988
522 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Isaiah v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ISAIAH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 30, 1988

Citations

522 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Rogers v. State

We remand for hearing of this issue without prejudice to the state's right to attempt to obtain a cost…

McHaffie v. State

We affirm on the merits but reverse the imposition of costs pursuant to sections 960.20 and 943.25(4) Florida…