From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Irwin v. Auto Finance Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Waco
Jan 8, 1931
34 S.W.2d 672 (Tex. Civ. App. 1931)

Opinion

No. 1037.

January 8, 1931.

Appeal from District Court, McLennan County; Richard I. Monroe, Judge.

Action by V. B. Rogers and W. Earl Harrison, a copartnership, doing business as the Auto Finance Company, against D. L. Irwin. To review the judgment, D. L. Irwin appeals. On motion to affirm judgment on certificate.

Motion overruled, and certificate dismissed.

Niblo Dodd, of Dallas, for appellant.

Spell, Naman Howell, of Waco, for appellee.


Appellees, V. B. Rogers and W. Earl Harrison, a copartnership doing business under the name of Auto Finance Company, have filed their motion to affirm the judgment of the trial court on certificate. The transcript filed with said motion shows that D. L. Irwin is plaintiff in error and that V. B. Rogers, W. Earl Harrison, Edwin M. Rabon, and H. H. Tompkins are defendants in error. There is nothing in the transcript to show that the defendant in error Tompkins has been served with citation or that he has entered his appearance or that the appeal has been as to him in any way perfected.

Article 1839 of the Revised Statutes provides that the transcript shall be filed in the appellate court within ninety days from the perfection of the appeal or service of the writ of error. In order to confer jurisdiction upon the appellate court, it is necessary for the defendant in error to be served with citation, and the appeal is not perfected where there are several defendants in error until each of them has either accepted service or been properly served as required by law. Crank v. Crunk, 23 Tex. 605; Thompson-Morris Co. v. Pine Poindexter, 55 Tex. 427; State Nat. Bank v. City of Dallas, 28 Tex. Civ. App. 299, 68 S.W. 334 (error refused). Before the appellate court can, under article 1841 of the Revised Statutes, affirm on certificate., it is necessary for the record to show affirmatively that the writ has been properly served for the time and in the manner required by law. McCloskey v. McCoy (Tex.Civ.App.) 89 S.W. 450; Moore v. Hitchler, 16 Tex. Civ. App. 44, 40 S.W. 197.

The motion is overruled, and the certificate dismissed.


Summaries of

Irwin v. Auto Finance Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Waco
Jan 8, 1931
34 S.W.2d 672 (Tex. Civ. App. 1931)
Case details for

Irwin v. Auto Finance Co.

Case Details

Full title:IRWIN v. AUTO FINANCE CO

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Waco

Date published: Jan 8, 1931

Citations

34 S.W.2d 672 (Tex. Civ. App. 1931)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Norris

D. B. Chapin, of Gladewater, for plaintiff in error. The Court of Civil Appeals erred in affirming the…

Irwin v. Auto Finance Co.

Reversed as to both sureties. See, also, 34 S.W.2d 672. Niblo Dodd, of Dallas, for plaintiff in…