From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Irwin Co., Inc. v. Tide Pub. Co., Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 17, 1952
13 F.R.D. 18 (S.D.N.Y. 1952)

Opinion

         Irwin Company, Inc., and George W. Irwin brought an action against Tide Publishing Company, Inc. The District Court, Weinfeld, J., held that papers were insufficient to require a deviation from usual rule that a plaintiff should submit to examination at his own expense in forum he has chosen.

         Order in accordance with opinion.

          Murphy, Block, Sullivan & Sawyer, New York City, John Dwight Sullivan, New York City, of counsel, for plaintiffs.

          Royce A. Wilson, New York City, for defendant.


          WEINFELD, District Judge.

          The present papers are insufficient to require a deviation from the usual rule that a plaintiff, having selected a forum, must be prepared to bear the necessary costs of prosecuting his claim, and, therefore, should submit to examination at his own expense in the forum he has chosen. See Morrison Export Co. Ltd. v. Goldstone, D.C., 12 F.R.D. 258. Assuming that the corporate plaintiff is experiencing serious financial difficulties, no information as to the financial condition of the individual plaintiff, whose deposition is sought, is set forth other than the statement than his only ‘ assured’ source of income is his salary of $500 per month, paid by the corporate plaintiff, and that he has a wife and two children whom he supports. Facts with respect to the existence of other sources of income, living expenses, and any suggestion as to his financial worth and like matters are lacking.

         The motion is, therefore, denied. The order to be entered may provide that if the individual plaintiff decides not to come to this District for the taking of his deposition, it may be conducted in Beverly Hills, California, upon condition that he pay the expenses and reasonable counsel fees to defendant's attorneys in an amount to be fixed by the Court. See Worth v. Trans-World Films, Inc., D.C., 11 F.R.D. 197.

         Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Irwin Co., Inc. v. Tide Pub. Co., Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 17, 1952
13 F.R.D. 18 (S.D.N.Y. 1952)
Case details for

Irwin Co., Inc. v. Tide Pub. Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IRWIN CO., Inc. et al. v. TIDE PUB. CO., Inc.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 17, 1952

Citations

13 F.R.D. 18 (S.D.N.Y. 1952)

Citing Cases

Pierre v. Bernuth, Lembeke Co., Inc.

The general rule is that a plaintiff must make himself available for examination before trial in the forum he…

Taejon Bristle Mfg. Co. v. Omnex Corp.

V. O. Machinoimport v. Clark Equipment Co., D.C., 11 F.R.D. 55; Morrison Export Co. v. Goldstone, footnote 1,…