From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Irvin v. Clarksville Gas Water

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Sep 6, 2011
NO. 3-11-0529 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 6, 2011)

Opinion

NO. 3-11-0529.

September 6, 2011


ORDER


Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 29), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved.

Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 20) is GRANTED, and all claims against Defendants Clarksville Gas Water Department, City of Clarksville Police Department and City of Clarksville Building Codes Department are DISMISSED.

In addition, all of Plaintiff's claims against the individual Defendants in their official capacities are DISMISSED. Finally, all claims against Defendants Hicket, Eley and Mathews in their individual capacities are DISMISSED.

Kim McMillan and Barbara Burroughs are not named Defendants in this case.

This action will proceed against Defendants Glenn, Pew and Bailey in their individual capacities. The case is referred to the Magistrate Judge in accordance with the Court's prior Order (Docket No. 7).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Irvin v. Clarksville Gas Water

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Sep 6, 2011
NO. 3-11-0529 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Irvin v. Clarksville Gas Water

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT THOMAS IRVIN v. CLARKSVILLE GAS WATER, et al

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Sep 6, 2011

Citations

NO. 3-11-0529 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 6, 2011)

Citing Cases

Pippin v. Silas

” Irvin v. Clarksville Gas & Water Dep't, No. 3:11-CV-00529, 2011 WL 3565248, at *7 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 12,…

Cater v. Sanders

“[O]nly those individuals who have been formally convicted of a crime may seek protection under the Eighth…