From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Irlbacker v. Roth

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 22, 1898
49 N.E. 1099 (N.Y. 1898)

Opinion

Submitted March 14, 1898

Decided March 22, 1898

Warren F. Miller for motion.

Shire Jellenek opposed.


Motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that it does not appear, either by the judgment or order of the Appellate Division, that the decision of that court was unanimous, with leave to renew upon payment of such costs, provided the record is so amended as to show that the judgment appealed from was rendered by the unanimous vote of all the judges who took part in the decision. ( Kaplan v. N.Y. Biscuit Co., 151 N.Y. 171.)


Summaries of

Irlbacker v. Roth

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 22, 1898
49 N.E. 1099 (N.Y. 1898)
Case details for

Irlbacker v. Roth

Case Details

Full title:JOHN IRLBACKER et al., Respondents, v . PHILIP W. ROTH, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 22, 1898

Citations

49 N.E. 1099 (N.Y. 1898)
49 N.E. 1099

Citing Cases

MATTER OF LOTZ

"In the absence of any clear expression or implication necessarily leading to that result, we should avoid a…