From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Iorio v. Rockland Light and Power Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1948
274 App. Div. 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Opinion

June 1, 1948.


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff as the result of slipping on a waxed floor in defendant's premises, order of the County Court of Rockland County, affirming a judgment of the Police Justice's Court of the Village of Suffern in favor of the plaintiff, reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, the judgment vacated, and the complaint dismissed on the law, with costs. Plaintiff did not establish actionable negligence. The fact that a floor is slippery by reason of its smoothness or polish, in the absence of proof of negligent application of the wax or polish, does not give rise to a cause of action. ( Nelson v. Salem Danish Lutheran Church, 270 App. Div. 1030, affd. 296 N.Y. 870.) There is no such proof in this record. Lewis, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Iorio v. Rockland Light and Power Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1948
274 App. Div. 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)
Case details for

Iorio v. Rockland Light and Power Company

Case Details

Full title:ROSE IORIO, Respondent, v. ROCKLAND LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1948

Citations

274 App. Div. 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Citing Cases

Swartz v. Rose

In our opinion, this was error. The requested charge is a correct statement of law ( Nelson v. Salem Danish…

Paddock v. Church of St. Barnabas

"The fact that a floor is slippery by reason of its smoothness or polish, in the absence of proof of…