From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Investment Corp. of S. Fla. v. City of Hallandale

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 17, 1971
245 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 1971)

Opinion

Nos. 40118, 40135.

February 3, 1971. Rehearing Denied March 17, 1971.

Writs of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District.

Marion E. Sibley and Allan M. Glaser of Sibley, Giblin, Levenson Ward, Miami Beach, for Investment Corp. of South Florida.

Ellis Spencer Butler and Ralph R. Quillian, Hollywood, for Clifton Meekins, and others.

Fred J. Ward of Crouch, Ward Africano, Hallendale, for respondents.


The District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, having certified to us that its decision in the cases of City of Hallandale v. Meekins et al., and City of Hallandale v. Investment Corporation of South Florida (Fla.App. 1970), 237 So.2d 318, passes upon a question of great public interest, we accepted jurisdiction for review pursuant to Article V, Section 4(2) of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A.

After hearing oral argument and carefully reviewing the briefs and the record, we have come to the conclusion that the decision of the District Court is correct and we adopt it as the decision of this Court. The writ, therefore, is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C.J., and ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

CARLTON, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Investment Corp. of S. Fla. v. City of Hallandale

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 17, 1971
245 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 1971)
Case details for

Investment Corp. of S. Fla. v. City of Hallandale

Case Details

Full title:INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTH FLORIDA, A FLORIDA CORPORATION…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Mar 17, 1971

Citations

245 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 1971)

Citing Cases

Rushfeldt v. Metropolitan Dade County

There is no requirement in the Dade County Code or otherwise mandating tiered assessments based on a…

Pomerance v. Homosassa Spec. W. Dist

Such a factual finding was not required. See City of Treasure Island v. Strong, 215 So.2d 473 (Fla. 1968)…