Summary
vacating the trial court's judgment and dismissing the case based upon the joint agreed motion for disposition pursuant to settlement agreement and Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 43.2(e)
Summary of this case from Jester Venture v. NashOpinion
No. 05-01-01577-CV.
Opinion Filed May 28, 2003.
On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. DV-99-08893-H, David Godbey, Judge.
Mark T. Josephs, Jackson, Walker, L.L.P., Robert Gilbreath, Jenkins Gilchrist, P.C., Dallas, for Appellant.
Eric G. Calhoun, Lawson, Fields, McCue, Lee Campbell, Addison, for Appellee.
Before Justices MORRIS, WRIGHT, and MOSELEY.
OPINION
Before the Court is the May 6, 2003 joint agreed motion for disposition pursuant to settlement agreement. As requested by the parties, without consideration of the merits, we VACATE the trial court's judgment, we ORDER the sureties on the supersedeas bond posted by appellants Internet America, Inc., Michael T. Maples, and William O. Hunt RELEASED, and we DISMISS this case. As agreed by the parties, each party shall bear his or her own costs. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(a)(2)(A); 43.2(e). The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to issue the mandate forthwith. See Tex.R.App.P. 18.1(c).