From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 25, 1976
530 F.2d 849 (9th Cir. 1976)

Opinion

No. 74-3362.

February 25, 1976.

William R. Coleman (argued), Fresno, Cal., for petitioner.

Peter J. Carre, Atty. (argued), NLRB, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

James M. Bell, (argued), of Crossland, Crossland, Caswell Bell, Fresno, Cal., for intervenor Valley Ford Sales, Inc.

Before HUFSTEDLER and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.

Honorable A. Sherman Christensen, Senior United States District Judge, District of Utah, sitting by designation.


OPINION


The case is before us upon the petition of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFLCIO, District Lodge No. 87, Local Lodge No. 1309 ("the Union") to review a decision of the NLRB.

Pursuant to a stipulation by The Union and the employer, Friendly Ford, the dispute was referred to an arbitrator. The dispute concerned the alleged illegality of the employer's unilateral rescission of its wage incentive plan, which the Union claimed was an unfair labor practice. The arbitrator concluded that the unilateral termination was not a violation of Sections 8(a)(1) and (5) of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 ( 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1) (5)). The arbitrator's conclusion was based upon his determination that the contract permitted the employer unilaterally to terminate and that the Union, in any event, had waived its right to complain about such termination.

The narrow issue before us is whether the Board abused its discretion in deferring to the decision of the arbitrator and in dismissing the unfair labor practice complaint. We can find no basis upon which to conclude that the Board abused its discretion in deferring to the arbitrator. ( E.g., Carey v. Westinghouse (1963) 375 U.S. 261, 84 S.Ct. 401, 11 L.Ed.2d 320; Spielberg Mfg. Co., (1955) 112 NLRB 1080.) For this reason we have no occasion to reach the merits of the underlying controversy.

Petition denied.


Summaries of

International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 25, 1976
530 F.2d 849 (9th Cir. 1976)
Case details for

International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Case Details

Full title:INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, AFL-CIO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 25, 1976

Citations

530 F.2d 849 (9th Cir. 1976)

Citing Cases

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pincus Bros.

Many cases reflect an abuse of discretion standard only through the unelaborated assertion that the Board's…

Hawaiian Hauling Service, Ltd. v. N.L.R.B

Upon review in this court the question is therefore whether the NLRB abused its discretion in reaching its…