From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Intercontinental Fur Corp. v. Goldstone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 13, 1968
30 A.D.2d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

June 13, 1968


Order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment and denying plaintiff's cross-motion for like relief, and the judgment thereon entered unanimously modified, on the law, the judgment vacated, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellant; and the motions for summary judgment denied. The composition of plaintiff's claim against defendant's client does not serve to release defendant from the tort claim predicated on his certification of a false financial statement of his client. ( New York Trust Co. v. Beairsto, 42 Misc.2d 419, affd. 20 A.D.2d 851. ) The contract obligation of the client to the plaintiff is separate and apart from defendant's tort liability to the plaintiff. Triable issues exist, among others, as to whether plaintiff did in fact extend credit to debtor in reliance on the statement, the amount of credit extended thereon, and the damages sustained by plaintiff.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Eager, Capozzoli, Rabin and McNally, JJ.


Summaries of

Intercontinental Fur Corp. v. Goldstone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 13, 1968
30 A.D.2d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Intercontinental Fur Corp. v. Goldstone

Case Details

Full title:INTERCONTINENTAL FUR CORP., Appellant, v. A. BERNARD GOLDSTONE, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 13, 1968

Citations

30 A.D.2d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

Matter of Sherman v. Bd. of Educ

This court by decision dated June 13, 1975, at Special Term, determined that issues existed which precluded a…