From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Interboro Mut. Ins. v. Callender

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 2001
288 A.D.2d 474 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

2001-02774

Submitted November 7, 2001.

November 26, 2001.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), dated February 23, 2001, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Feeney, Gayoso Fitzpatrick, LLP, Hauppauge, N.Y. (Elizabeth A. Fitzpatrick of counsel), for appellant.

Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker Sauer, Mineola, N.Y. (Jonathan A. Dachs of counsel), for proposed additional respondent-respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, HOWARD MILLER, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is granted, and the arbitration is permanently stayed.

The Supreme Court should have granted the petition to stay arbitration of the uninsured motorist claim. Henry Callender failed to provide the petitioner with notice of his uninsured motorist claim as soon as practicable, as required by his insurance policy (see, Matter of Metropolitan Prop. Cas. Ins. Co. v. Mancuso, 93 N.Y.2d 487; Matter of Eagle Ins. Co. v. Bernardine, 266 A.D.2d 543; Matter of Nationwide Ins. Co. v. Montopoli, 262 A.D.2d 647).

In light of our determination, it is unnecessary to address the petitioner's remaining contentions.

SANTUCCI, J.P., ALTMAN, FLORIO, H. MILLER and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Interboro Mut. Ins. v. Callender

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 2001
288 A.D.2d 474 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Interboro Mut. Ins. v. Callender

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF INTERBORO MUTUAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 26, 2001

Citations

288 A.D.2d 474 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
732 N.Y.S.2d 906

Citing Cases

State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. v. Sparacio

However, the Supreme Court failed to determine the issue of timely written notice of the claim. Pursuant to…

Matter of State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Where, as here, an insured is required to…