Opinion
3D21-1439
02-16-2022
Matthew Estevez, P.A., and Matthew Estevez, for appellant. Max A. Goldfarb, for appellee.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Lower Tribunal No. 20-21607 SP, Myriam Lehr, Judge.
Matthew Estevez, P.A., and Matthew Estevez, for appellant.
Max A. Goldfarb, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Innova Investment Group, LLC, appeals the dismissal of its complaint against Jennifer Rolle. At the time of the dismissal, Innova had a pending motion to amend, which would have been the first amendment. The order on appeal, although entered without prejudice by noting that "plaintiff may file a landlord-tenant case," improperly denied the motion to amend and dismissed the cause. See If Six Were Nine, LLC v. Lincoln Road III, LLC, 242 So.3d 1187, 1188 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (explaining circumstances in which amendment should be permitted); see also Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.190(a) ("[a] party may amend a pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served"). Accordingly, we vacate the order on appeal and reverse and remand for the trial court to permit the filing of the amended complaint, which may be conditioned upon the payment of any additional filing fees resulting from the transfer from small claims to county court jurisdiction.
Reversed and remanded.