From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Innes v. Dalsheim

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Feb 3, 1989
703 F. Supp. 245 (E.D.N.Y. 1989)

Opinion

No. 87 C 2064.

February 3, 1989.

Jonathan Silbermann, New York City, for petitioner.

John J. Santucci, Dist. Atty., Queens County (Michael O'Brien, Asst. Dist. Atty., of counsel), Kew Gardens, N.Y., for respondents.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in its opinion filed December 29, 1988 reversing the judgment of this court and remanding the case, directs the court to grant petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus.

The writ is granted unless within sixty days the prosecutor permits petitioner to withdraw his plea of guilty and either to stand for trial or to commence further plea negotiations with the state.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Innes v. Dalsheim

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Feb 3, 1989
703 F. Supp. 245 (E.D.N.Y. 1989)
Case details for

Innes v. Dalsheim

Case Details

Full title:James INNES, Petitioner, v. Stephen DALSHEIM, Superintendent, Downstate…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Feb 3, 1989

Citations

703 F. Supp. 245 (E.D.N.Y. 1989)

Citing Cases

People v. Molesse

Upon the return of the defendant on a warrant, the court found that it was no longer bound by its promise…

People v. Gibbs

The defendant's explanation for his contradictory testimony at the trial was vague and insufficient (see,…