From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inhabitants, c., Plainfield v. Cleary

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 4, 1934
172 A. 565 (N.J. 1934)

Opinion

Argued February 7, 1934 —

Decided May 4, 1934.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is printed in 11 N.J. Mis. R. 922.

For the respondent, William Newcorn.

For the appellants, Dolliver Feaster, Horace E. Bunker and Codington, Blatz Smalley.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, VAN BUSKIRK, HETFIELD, DEAR, DILL, JJ. 7.

For reversal — HEHER, PERSKIE, KAYS, WELLS, JJ. 4.

For reversal in part — PARKER, LLOYD, JJ. 2.


Summaries of

Inhabitants, c., Plainfield v. Cleary

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 4, 1934
172 A. 565 (N.J. 1934)
Case details for

Inhabitants, c., Plainfield v. Cleary

Case Details

Full title:INHABITANTS OF THE CITY OF PLAINFIELD, RESPONDENT, v. FRANK L. CLEARY…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 4, 1934

Citations

172 A. 565 (N.J. 1934)
172 A. 565

Citing Cases

Era S., LLC v. Mayor

In Barkman v. City of Hackensack, 114 N.J.L. 506, 507-09 (Sup. Ct. 1935), the court approved, but reduced, a…