From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingri v. Star Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1909
134 App. Div. 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)

Opinion

November, 1909.

Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.


This is an action for libel published January 27, 1902. Issue was joined on July 2, 1902. The case was noticed for trial for the October term, 1902. Plaintiff failed to file a note of issue as required upon the making up of a new calendar in September, 1904, and the case was, therefore, dropped from the calendar. It was restored April 4, 1905. On March 22, 1907, the case appeared upon the call calendar and upon plaintiff's failure to answer and have the same set down for trial, it was marked off and dropped from the calendar. Plaintiff procured an order restoring it to the calendar on March 20, 1909. Defendant thereafter made a motion to dismiss for want of prosecution, and upon showing that junior issues had been tried established its prima facie case. Plaintiff was then called upon to satisfactorily explain her extraordinary delay of seven years in bringing this action for an alleged libel to trial. This she has not done, and the motion to dismiss should have been granted. The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

Ingri v. Star Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1909
134 App. Div. 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)
Case details for

Ingri v. Star Company

Case Details

Full title:MARIA PASSANTINA INGRI, Respondent, v . THE STAR COMPANY, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1909

Citations

134 App. Div. 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)

Citing Cases

Haase v. New York Herald Company

June, 1921. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars…

Armstrong v. Star Co.

Upon an application of this character, where the moving papers make a prima facie case, it is incumbent upon…