From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingram v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jan 21, 1954
209 F.2d 818 (D.C. Cir. 1954)

Opinion

No. 11827.

Argued December 22, 1953.

Decided January 21, 1954.

Mr. Foster Wood, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Mr. Samuel J. L'Hommedieu, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U.S. Atty., and Lewis A. Carroll and Arthur J. McLaughlin, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee. Mr. William J. Peck, Asst. U.S. Atty. at time record was filed, Washington, D.C., entered an appearance for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER, and FAHY, Circuit Judges.


Appellant waived trial by jury on a charge of violating the lottery laws, D.C. Code 1951, §§ 22-1501, 22-1502, 52 Stat. 198-199. She was convicted. She afterwards urged, in support of a motion for a new trial, that her trial counsel "refused to permit her to testify" and failed to introduce certain other testimony. In our opinion the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, and its judgment placing the defendant on probation is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Ingram v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jan 21, 1954
209 F.2d 818 (D.C. Cir. 1954)
Case details for

Ingram v. United States

Case Details

Full title:INGRAM v. UNITED STATES

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Jan 21, 1954

Citations

209 F.2d 818 (D.C. Cir. 1954)

Citing Cases

People v. Crosby

It has also been ruled that failure to call a witness or witnesses does not, in and of itself, constitute…