From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingram v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 30, 1941
3 So. 2d 434 (Ala. 1941)

Opinion

6 Div. 895.

June 30, 1941.

Thos. S. Lawson, Atty. Gen., and Francis M. Kohn, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the petition.

Henry H. Mize and Jonas Spiro, Jr., both of Tuscaloosa, opposed.


The attorney general, in brief, sets out evidence from the record, not stated or referred to in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, which, we cannot consider on certiorari under the limited rules of review. The responsibility for interpreting the evidence is on the Court of Appeals. It is only when that court states the evidence in full that we will review the conclusions of fact.

The writ is due to be denied on the evidence stated by the Court of Appeals in the opinion.

Writ denied.

All the Justices concur, except KNIGHT, J., not sitting.


Summaries of

Ingram v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 30, 1941
3 So. 2d 434 (Ala. 1941)
Case details for

Ingram v. State

Case Details

Full title:INGRAM v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jun 30, 1941

Citations

3 So. 2d 434 (Ala. 1941)
241 Ala. 455

Citing Cases

Ingram v. State

Reversed and rendered. Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Ingram v. State, 241 Ala. 455, 3 So.2d 434.…