From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingram v. Miller

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 26, 2014
114 A.D.3d 908 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-02-26

Shaquka S. INGRAM, respondent, v. Darren Lee MILLER, appellant. (Action No. 1) Joseph Valentine, plaintiff, v. Darren Lee Miller, appellant, et al., defendants. (Action No. 2).

Carman, Callahan & Ingham, LLP, Farmingdale, N.Y. (Tracy S. Reifer of counsel), for appellant. Wellerstein & Associates, P.C., Maspeth, N.Y. (Hedva Wellerstein and Mary Joseph of counsel), for respondent.


Carman, Callahan & Ingham, LLP, Farmingdale, N.Y. (Tracy S. Reifer of counsel), for appellant. Wellerstein & Associates, P.C., Maspeth, N.Y. (Hedva Wellerstein and Mary Joseph of counsel), for respondent.

In two related actions to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Darren Lee Miller appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kurtz, J.), dated August 14, 2012, which denied his motion to stay all proceedings in the actions pursuant to CPLR 2201 pending resolution of a declaratory judgment action entitled GEICO Indem. Ins. Co. v. Valdes, commenced in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, under Index No. 017760/11.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

“Except where otherwise prescribed by law, the court in which an action is pending may grant a stay of proceedings in a proper case, upon such terms as may be just” (CPLR 2201; see Morreale v. Morreale, 84 A.D.3d 1187, 1188, 923 N.Y.S.2d 876). Here, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the appellant's motion to stay all proceedings in the subject actions pending resolution of an action commenced by a codefendant's insurer seeking, among other things, a declaratory judgment regarding insurance coverage for the codefendant. The parties in the declaratory judgment action were not sufficiently identical to, or overlapping with, the parties in these actions to warrant a stay ( see Winters Bros. Recycling Corp. v. H.B. Millwork, Inc., 72 A.D.3d 942, 942–943, 900 N.Y.S.2d 99;cf. Peluso v. Red Rose Rest., Inc., 78 A.D.3d 802, 803, 910 N.Y.S.2d 378;Dionisio v. Auto Hire, 67 A.D.2d 996, 996–997, 413 N.Y.S.2d 727). BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, LOTT and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ingram v. Miller

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 26, 2014
114 A.D.3d 908 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Ingram v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:Shaquka S. INGRAM, respondent, v. Darren Lee MILLER, appellant. (Action…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 26, 2014

Citations

114 A.D.3d 908 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
114 A.D.3d 908
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 1296

Citing Cases

In re Ziv

Except where otherwise prescribed by law, the court in which an action is pending may grant a stay of…

In re Eshagian

"Except where otherwise prescribed by law, the court in which an action is pending may grant a stay of…