From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inbar Grp. v. St. Mark's World, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Nov 19, 2020
188 A.D.3d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

12438 Index No. 653565/16 Case No. 2020-00525

11-19-2020

INBAR GROUP, INC., Plaintiff–Respondent–Appellant, v. ST. MARK'S WORLD, INC., et al., Defendants–Respondents, Michael Morgan, Defendant–Appellant–Respondent.

Soffey & Soffey LLC, Garden City (Joseph E. Soffey of counsel), for appellant-respondent. Dunn Lambert, LLC, New York (Harlan L. Cohen of counsel), for respondent-appellant. Griffin Hamersky LLP, New York (Michael D. Hamersky of counsel), for respondents.


Soffey & Soffey LLC, Garden City (Joseph E. Soffey of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

Dunn Lambert, LLC, New York (Harlan L. Cohen of counsel), for respondent-appellant.

Griffin Hamersky LLP, New York (Michael D. Hamersky of counsel), for respondents.

Webber, J.P., González, Scarpulla, Shulman, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David B. Cohen, J.), entered December 12, 2019, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff partial summary judgment as to defendant Michael Morgan, and denied the branches of plaintiff's motion seeking partial summary judgment against defendant St. Mark's World, Inc. and summary judgment as to damages, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny partial summary judgment as to Morgan, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

As Morgan signed the parties' original agreement in his corporate capacity on behalf of St. Mark's World, Inc., he would ordinarily not be personally liable under that agreement ( Diaz v. Siegel, 23 A.D.3d 251, 252, 806 N.Y.S.2d 9 [1st Dept. 2005] ). However, Morgan's signature without reference to his corporate capacity in the "extension" of the original agreement, and other surrounding circumstances, create a fact issue as to the capacity in which he signed each agreement.

Given that there is a fact issue as to the capacity in which Morgan signed the agreements, there is also a fact issue as to whether the corporate defendant is liable under the agreements.

Finally, because there are issues of fact about the amounts paid and owing to Morgan that might be subject to commission, as well as fact issues at to liability, summary judgment as to damages was properly denied.


Summaries of

Inbar Grp. v. St. Mark's World, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Nov 19, 2020
188 A.D.3d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Inbar Grp. v. St. Mark's World, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Inbar Group, Inc., Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant, v. St. Mark's World…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 19, 2020

Citations

188 A.D.3d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
132 N.Y.S.3d 630
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 6879

Citing Cases

Inbar Grp. v. St. Mark's World, Inc.

On November 19, 2020, the Appellate Division, First Department modified the 12/5/19 decision to deny partial…