From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inaganti v. Columbia Properties Harrisburg

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 25, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1651 (E.D. Pa. May. 25, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1651.

May 25, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2010, upon consideration of the Motion for Remand by Plaintiffs Prameela Inaganti and Rao Inaganti (titled Response to Notice of Removal) (Docket No. 6) and the Response of Defendants Columbia Properties Harrisburg L.L.C. d/b/a Harrisburg Courtyard by Marriott and Columbia Sussex Corporation a/k/a Harrisburg Courtyard by Marriott (Docket No. 9), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.


Summaries of

Inaganti v. Columbia Properties Harrisburg

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 25, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1651 (E.D. Pa. May. 25, 2010)
Case details for

Inaganti v. Columbia Properties Harrisburg

Case Details

Full title:PRAMEELA INAGANTI and RAO INAGANTI, h/w, Plaintiffs, v. COLUMBIA…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 25, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1651 (E.D. Pa. May. 25, 2010)

Citing Cases

Young v. Wal-Mart Stores E., LP

Id. at *4. See also Davis v. Donnelly, No. 14-6163, 2015 WL 765988, at *4 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 24, 2015) (Kelly,…

Robinson v. Coach Leasing, Inc.

Rather, the complaint contains largely boilerplate allegations of amorphous injuries—the likes of which…