From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Ziaire M

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 27, 2003
309 A.D.2d 938 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2001-08793

Argued October 3, 2003.

October 27, 2003.

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Hunt, J.), dated September 10, 2001, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated July 16, 2001, made after a hearing, finding that she had neglected the subject child, suspended judgment and paroled the child to the custody of the maternal grandparents for a period of up to 12 months under the petitioner's supervision. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated July 16, 2001.

Daniel P. Moskowitz, Jamaica, N.Y., for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Francis F. Caputo and Paul L. Herzfeld of counsel), for petitioner-respondent.

Monica Drinane, New York, N.Y. (Marcia Egger of counsel), Law Guardian for the child.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order of disposition as paroled the child to the custody of the maternal grandparents for a period of up to 12 months under the petitioner's supervision is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, as that portion of the order has expired by its own terms; and it is further,

ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from so much of the order of disposition as paroled the child to the custody of the maternal grandparents for a period of up to 12 months must be dismissed as academic because that portion of the order has expired by its own terms. However, the adjudication of neglect has not been rendered academic ( see Matter of Francis S., 296 A.D.2d 507).

The Family Court's finding of neglect was supported by evidence of the child's positive toxicology for marihuana at birth and the mother's repeated and habitual use of marihuana and her failure to participate in a drug rehabilitation program ( see Matter of Nassau County Dept. of Social Servs. [Dante M.] v. Denise J., 87 N.Y.2d 73; Matter of Sharonda S., 301 A.D.2d 532, 534; Matter of Sidney S., 292 A.D.2d 534).

The mother's remaining contentions are without merit.

ALTMAN, J.P., FLORIO, FRIEDMANN and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Ziaire M

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 27, 2003
309 A.D.2d 938 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In the Matter of Ziaire M

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ZIAIRE M. (ANONYMOUS). ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 27, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 938 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
766 N.Y.S.2d 98

Citing Cases

In re MN

Act § 1053 At the conclusion of a dispositional hearing after a neglect finding, the court shall enter an…

Suffolk Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Fay A. (In re Anthony A.)

The mother appeals. Contrary to the mother's contention, the Family Court's finding that she neglected…