From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Zakrya M

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 2005
18 A.D.3d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-03424.

May 23, 2005.

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Bogacz, J.), dated March 19, 2004, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated February 1, 2002, made after a hearing, finding that she neglected the child by failing to provide her with adequate medical care, inter alia, placed the child in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services of Queens County for a period of 12 months. The appeal from the order of disposition brings up for review the fact-finding order.

Before: H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order of disposition as placed the child in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services of Queens County for a period of 12 months is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, as the period of placement has expired ( see Matter of Shanita V., 7 AD3d 804); and it is further,

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Family Court correctly found, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the appellant neglected her child by failing to provide her with adequate medical care ( see Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [A]; § 1046 [b] [i]). The petitioner established a prima facie case of neglect, despite the absence of expert medical testimony, because the child was in such condition as should not ordinarily occur but for the actions or omissions of a parent or other person legally responsible for her care ( see Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [ii]; Matter of Aniyah F., 13 AD3d 529, 530). The appellant failed to advance a sufficient and credible explanation for the child's condition to rebut the petitioner's prima facie case ( see Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [ii]; Matter of Aniyah F., supra at 531). When the appellant became aware of the child's condition, she failed to promptly seek medical care for the child, thus supporting a finding of neglect on her part ( see Matter of C. Children, 207 AD2d 888, 889; Matter of A. Children, 189 AD2d 872).


Summaries of

In the Matter of Zakrya M

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 2005
18 A.D.3d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Zakrya M

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ZAKRYA M. ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 23, 2005

Citations

18 A.D.3d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
795 N.Y.S.2d 683

Citing Cases

Suffolk Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Ezena L. (In re Altana D.)

The Family Court's credibility determinations are entitled to deference on appeal unless clearly unsupported…

Legend G. v. Alba S. Legend SR G.

Thus, the petition must be dismissed.Matter of Zakrya M., 18 AD3d 754 (2d Dep't. 2005) and Matter of C.…