From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Xavier C

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 17, 2003
303 A.D.2d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1999-05754

Submitted February 13, 2003.

March 17, 2003.

In four related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Lehman, J.), entered May 20, 1999, which, without a hearing, granted the petitioner's motion for summary judgment and found that he neglected the subject children.

Salvatore C. Adamo, Patchogue, N.Y., for appellant.

Robert J. Cimino, County Attorney, Central Islip, N.Y. (Randall J. Ratje of counsel), for respondent.

Before: SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the fact-finding order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the order of disposition dated September 27, 1999, is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

The Family Court erred in granting the motion of the petitioner, the Suffolk County Department of Social Services, for summary judgment and finding that the father neglected the subject children. The Family Court may grant summary judgment in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10 where a parent has been convicted in a criminal action of one or more acts alleged in the petition (see Matter of Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs. v. James M., 83 N.Y.2d 178; Matter of Tali W., 299 A.D.2d 413). However, in this case, there is no evidence that the acts of violence perpetrated against the mother, which the father admitted during his plea colloquy in a related criminal proceeding, took place in the children's presence, impaired their physical, mental, or emotional condition, or placed them in imminent danger (cf. Matter of Carlos M., 293 A.D.2d 617; Matter of Cybill V., 279 A.D.2d 582; Matter of Deandre T., 253 A.D.2d 497). Accordingly, the Family Court must conduct a fact-finding hearing.

In light of our determination, it is necessary to vacate the order of disposition, dated September 27, 1999.

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., SMITH, KRAUSMAN and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Xavier C

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 17, 2003
303 A.D.2d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In the Matter of Xavier C

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF XAVIER C. (ANONYMOUS). CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 17, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
756 N.Y.S.2d 474

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Davin G

Ordered that the order as amended is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The…