From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Thomas Z

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 2004
4 A.D.3d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-00110.

Decided February 2, 2004.

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate the father's parental rights on the ground of abandonment, the father appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Amodeo, J.), dated November 25, 2002, which, without a dispositional hearing, terminated his parental rights and transferred custody and guardianship of the subject child to the Dutchess County Department of Social Services for the purpose of adoption.

Yasmin Daley Duncan, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.

Ian G. MacDonald, County Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Thomas P. Delpizzo of counsel), for respondent.

Neal D. Futerfas, White Plains, N.Y., Law Guardian for the child.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, SONDRA MILLER and REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that the appellant abandoned his child during the six-month period prior to the filing of the petition in view of the total absence of contact between the appellant and the child during that period ( see Social Services Law § 384-b; Matter of Julius P., 63 N.Y.2d 477; Matter of Tashara B., 299 A.D.2d 356; Matter of I.R., 153 A.D.2d 559). The appellant's incarceration and his residence in a drug-treatment facility did not prevent him from communicating with the child or the agency by letter or by telephone ( see Matter of Tashara B., supra at 357; Matter of Derrick J., 287 A.D.2d 503; Matter of T. Children, 284 A.D.2d 401; Matter of I.R., supra at 561).

Under the circumstances, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in terminating the appellant's parental rights without conducting a dispositional hearing ( see Matter of Tashara B., supra; Matter of Little Flower Children's Servs. v. Clinton Tracy M., 222 A.D.2d 507; Matter of St. Vincent's Servs. v. Donald D., 205 A.D.2d 785). Finally, the record indicates that the appellant was provided effective assistance of counsel ( see Matter of Tashara B., supra).

SANTUCCI, J.P., FLORIO, S. MILLER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Thomas Z

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 2004
4 A.D.3d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In the Matter of Thomas Z

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS Z. (ANONYMOUS). DUTCHESS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 2, 2004

Citations

4 A.D.3d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
770 N.Y.S.2d 879

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Kenneth

Memorandum: Kenneth D., Sr. (respondent) appeals from an order in a proceeding under Social Services Law §…

In the Matter of Elizabeth Susanna R

Ordered that the orders of disposition are affirmed, without costs or disbursements. "A parent's incarcerated…