From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Summers

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jun 7, 2004
278 Ga. 57 (Ga. 2004)

Summary

imposing a six-month suspension for a lawyer's violation of Rule 1.15 where he held $25,000 in his trust account for a client for about five years; for periods of time, the balance of the account was insufficient to cover the obligation to the client; and there were several factors in mitigation, including that the lawyer had "ma[d]e the client whole"

Summary of this case from In re Cook

Opinion

S04Y1284.

DECIDED JUNE 7, 2004.

Suspension.

William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Jenny K. Mittelman, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.

James E. Spence, Jr., for Summers.


This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the Petition for Voluntary Discipline filed by Respondent Richard W. Summers pursuant to Bar Rule 4-227 (b) (2) prior to the State Bar's issuance of a Formal Complaint. In his petition, Summers seeks the imposition of a six-month suspension for his admitted violations of Standard 65 (A) of Bar Rule 4-102 (d) and Rule 1.15 (I) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct found at Bar Rule 4-102 (d). Although violations of Standard 65 and Rule 1.15 (I) are punishable by disbarment, the State Bar recommends that this Court accept Summers' voluntary petition.

In his petition, Summers admits that he received a $25,000 settlement check on behalf of a client which he placed in trust on the client's behalf. He further admits that he held the check between September 1997 and July 2002 and acknowledges that for periods during this time the balance in his trust account was insufficient to cover his obligation to his client. As a result, he agrees that he violated Standard 65 (A) and Rule 1.15 (I). In mitigation, we note that Summers timely made a good faith effort to rectify the consequences of his misconduct and make the client whole, that he has exhibited a cooperative attitude toward the disciplinary proceedings, and that he is remorseful. As Summers' request for a six-month suspension is consistent with this Court's prior decisions, see In the Matter of Kenneth L. Drucker, 274 Ga. 536 ( 556 SE2d 129) (2001); In the Matter of Thomas P. deRosay, 268 Ga. 868 ( 494 SE2d 339) (1998), we agree that it is the appropriate sanction in this matter. Accordingly, we accept Summers' petition for voluntary discipline and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law in Georgia for a period of six months. He is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Six-month suspension. All the Justices concur.


DECIDED JUNE 7, 2004.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Summers

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jun 7, 2004
278 Ga. 57 (Ga. 2004)

imposing a six-month suspension for a lawyer's violation of Rule 1.15 where he held $25,000 in his trust account for a client for about five years; for periods of time, the balance of the account was insufficient to cover the obligation to the client; and there were several factors in mitigation, including that the lawyer had "ma[d]e the client whole"

Summary of this case from In re Cook
Case details for

In the Matter of Summers

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD W. SUMMERS

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Jun 7, 2004

Citations

278 Ga. 57 (Ga. 2004)
597 S.E.2d 364

Citing Cases

In re Nakata S. Smith Fitch

In aggravation, we find that Fitch's actions demonstrated a lack of concern for the interests of her client…

In re Tyson

Further, the State Bar maintains that the Court has previously imposed a six-month suspension for similar…