From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sisk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 17, 2005
23 A.D.3d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

November 17, 2005.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1986. He maintained an office for the practice of law in Virginia, where he was admitted in 1978.

Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Geoffrey E. Major of counsel), for petitioner.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur.


By order of revocation entered upon respondent's consent, effective August 31, 2005, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board revoked respondent's license to practice law. In his consenting affidavit, respondent admitted to twice appearing on behalf of a client in federal court in Virginia while he was suspended from practice in that state for failure to comply with continuing legal education requirements. He also made apparently misleading statements to the court regarding his status. Respondent also admitted that the Virginia bar was aware of allegations that he had allegedly threatened to burn down a house, which resulted in the issuance of a protective order, and that he was allegedly involved in separate incidents of the unauthorized taking of certain personal property.

Petitioner moves for an order imposing reciprocal discipline ( see 22 NYCRR 806.19). Respondent has not appeared in response to the motion. We grant the motion and further conclude that respondent should be reciprocally disbarred ( see e.g. Matter of Weiss, 261 AD2d 708).

Ordered that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys of the State of New York, effective immediately; and it is further ordered that respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; respondent is forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority; or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice with relation thereto; and it is further ordered that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court's rules regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys ( see 22 NYCRR 806.9).


Summaries of

In re Sisk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 17, 2005
23 A.D.3d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In re Sisk

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KENNETH D. SISK, an Attorney, Respondent. COMMITTEE ON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 17, 2005

Citations

23 A.D.3d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 8818
804 N.Y.S.2d 137

Citing Cases

In re Powers

Turning to the issue of the appropriate disciplinary sanction, we note that respondent's serious professional…