From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Sheldon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 11, 2006
29 A.D.3d 1143 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

99340.

May 11, 2006.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 16, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Kathleen A. Sheldon, Rochester, appellant pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York City (Bessie Bazile of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Peters, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur.


Claimant worked as a part-time waitress at a restaurant from February 1999 until December 2004. Thereafter, she applied for unemployment insurance benefits and a hearing was held on her claim. While the employer testified that claimant quit her job, claimant stated that she was unable to work due to a knee injury. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ultimately ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant now appeals.

We affirm. Resigning from a job due to a medical condition has been held not to constitute good cause for leaving employment absent evidence that the separation from employment was medically necessary ( see Matter of Mercier [Commissioner of Labor], 296 AD2d 761; Matter of Krinsky [Sweeney], 238 AD2d 659). Here, claimant admitted that she did not provide her employer with medical documentation establishing her inability to work due to her knee condition and, in fact, stated that her doctor did not tell her she could not work. In view of this, as well as the employer's testimony that claimant abruptly quit, substantial evidence supports the Board's decision.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Sheldon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 11, 2006
29 A.D.3d 1143 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In the Matter of Sheldon

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of KATHLEEN A. SHELDON, Appellant. COMMISSIONER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 11, 2006

Citations

29 A.D.3d 1143 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 3677
814 N.Y.S.2d 792

Citing Cases

In the Matter of the Claim of Daniel T. Fronczak

We affirm. Although claimant maintains that he was unable to perform the job based upon physical limitations…

In re Fbonczak

We affirm. Although claimant maintains that he was unable to perform the job based upon physical limitations…