From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Ronald J.P. Volino v. Calvi

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 16, 2011
87 A.D.3d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-08-16

In the Matter of Ronald J.P. VOLINO, et al., appellants,v.Carlo J. CALVI, respondent-respondent, et al., respondent.


In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16–102, inter alia, to invalidate a petition designating Carlo J. Calvi as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 13, 2011, for the nomination of the Republican Party as its candidate for the public office of Mayor of the City of Yonkers, the petitioners appeal from a final order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), dated August 4, 2011, which, after a hearing, denied the petition to invalidate the designating petition and dismissed the proceeding.

ORDERED that the final order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

As a general rule, a candidate's designating petition will be invalidated on the ground of fraud only if there is a showing that the entire designating petition is permeated with fraud ( see Matter of Ferraro v. McNab, 60 N.Y.2d 601, 467 N.Y.S.2d 193, 454 N.E.2d 533; Matter of Harris v. Duran, 76 A.D.3d 658, 659, 905 N.Y.S.2d 777; Matter of Drace v. Sayegh, 43 A.D.3d 481, 844 N.Y.S.2d 314; Matter of Ragusa v. Roper, 286 A.D.2d 516, 516–517, 729 N.Y.S.2d 647). Even when the designating petition is not permeated with fraud, the petition generally will be invalidated where the candidate has participated in or is chargeable with knowledge of the fraud ( see Matter of Drace v. Sayegh, 43 A.D.3d at 482, 844 N.Y.S.2d 314; Matter of Leonard v. Pradhan, 286 A.D.2d 459, 729 N.Y.S.2d 523; Matter of MacDougall v. Board of Elections of City of N.Y., 133 A.D.2d 198, 199, 518 N.Y.S.2d 840).

Here, the petitioners did not sustain their burden of establishing, prima facie, that the signatures on the designating petition of Carlo J. Calvi were permeated with fraud or that Calvi participated in or is chargeable with knowledge of such fraud. Accordingly, there is no reason to disturb the Supreme Court's determination denying the petition to invalidate the

designating petition and dismissing the proceeding.

MASTRO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, CHAMBERS, ROMAN and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Ronald J.P. Volino v. Calvi

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 16, 2011
87 A.D.3d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In the Matter of Ronald J.P. Volino v. Calvi

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Ronald J.P. VOLINO, et al., appellants,v.Carlo J. CALVI…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 16, 2011

Citations

87 A.D.3d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
928 N.Y.S.2d 470
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 6280

Citing Cases

Felder v. Storobin

III. Legal Analysis A candidate's designating petition will be invalidated on the ground of fraud if there is…

In the Matter of Jane Bonner v. Negron

. “As a general rule, a candidate's designating petition will be invalidated on the ground of fraud only if…