From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Rivera v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 15, 2000
273 A.D.2d 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Decided and Entered: June 15, 2000

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Anthony Rivera, Pine City, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Lew A. Millenbach of counsel), Albany, for respondents.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Spain, Graffeo, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Following a tier III hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of assault on an inmate and violent conduct. Upon petitioner's administrative appeal, the determination was affirmed. Petitioner subsequently commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding and we confirm.

We reject petitioner's contention that the misbehavior report is defective because it fails to state the specific role that petitioner played in the assault (see, 7 NYCRR 251-3.1 [c]). The misbehavior report states that petitioner, acting in concert with others, cut another inmate in the face with a razor-type weapon. Thus, the report contained the required specificity (see,Matter of Vogelsang v. Coombe, 105 A.D.2d 913, 914, aff'd on mem below 66 N.Y.2d 835).

Contrary to petitioner's contention, the detailed misbehavior report and the testimony from the correction officer who authored it, together with the testimony from the confidential informant stating that petitioner did inflict serious injury upon another inmate, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Cobb v. Selsky, 270 A.D.2d 747, 706 N.Y.S.2d 199; Matter of Santos v. Goord, 255 A.D.2d 949).

Moreover, nothing in the record supports petitioner's claim that the Hearing Officer presiding at this proceeding was biased or that the outcome of the hearing flowed from the alleged bias (see, Matter of Bernier v. Goord, 269 A.D.2d 640, 704 N.Y.S.2d 169). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be without merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Rivera v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 15, 2000
273 A.D.2d 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

In the Matter of Rivera v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY RIVERA, Petitioner, v. DAVID MILLER, AS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 15, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
709 N.Y.S.2d 665

Citing Cases

Matter of Perez v. Artus

While petitioner argues that the misbehavior report failed to specify what his exact role was while acting in…

In the Matter of Lebron

Petitioner received adequate employee assistance and was provided with all witnesses and documents necessary…