From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Ramirez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 21, 2004
13 A.D.3d 248 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

4565.

December 21, 2004.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered on or about April 10, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, granted the cross motion of defendant Fordham Bedford Housing Corporation (Fordham) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered September 11, 2003, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as abandoned.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Lerner, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.


The City owned and the Tenants' Association leased the building in which plaintiff allegedly contracted lead poisoning during a lead paint abatement project. Although the Tenants' Association had hired Fordham to assist in the building's management, it is undisputed that the Tenants' Association, not Fordham, had the power to recommend repairs to the City, and that it was the City's prerogative to authorize them. Inasmuch as Fordham did not in its capacity as managing agent have complete and exclusive control over the allegedly injurious abatement project, it is not liable for plaintiff's harm ( see German v. Bronx United in Leveraging Dollars, Inc., 258 AD2d 251). [ See 2003 NY Slip Op 50950(U).]


Summaries of

In the Matter of Ramirez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 21, 2004
13 A.D.3d 248 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In the Matter of Ramirez v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MIGUEL RAMIREZ, Appellant v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 21, 2004

Citations

13 A.D.3d 248 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
787 N.Y.S.2d 259

Citing Cases

Velez v. South Nine Realty Corp.

Since the plaintiff's failed to make a prima facie showing of their entitlement to judgment as a matter of…

Smolin v. 175 Water Street Condominium

Lennon v. Oakhurst Gardens Corp., supra at 898. See also,James v. Greenpoint Financial Corp., 34 A.D.3d 644,…