From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Nigel Joseph v. Laclair

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Aug 4, 2011
87 A.D.3d 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-08-4

In the Matter of Nigel JOSEPH, Petitioner,v.Darwin LaCLAIR, as Superintendent of Franklin Correctional Facility, Respondent.


Nigel Joseph, Malone, petitioner pro se.Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating a number of prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed , all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory surcharge has been credited to petitioner's inmate account. In view of this and given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Charles v. Bezio, 80 A.D.3d 975, 913 N.Y.S.2d 925 [2011]; Matter of Avincola v. Fischer, 74 A.D.3d 1672, 902 N.Y.S.2d 454 [2010], lv. denied 15 N.Y.3d 711, 2010 WL 4116955 [2010] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Nigel Joseph v. Laclair

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Aug 4, 2011
87 A.D.3d 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In the Matter of Nigel Joseph v. Laclair

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Nigel JOSEPH, Petitioner,v.Darwin LaCLAIR, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 4, 2011

Citations

87 A.D.3d 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 6170
927 N.Y.S.2d 806