From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Nicholas A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 4, 2006
28 A.D.3d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-04306.

April 4, 2006.

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Nassau County (Marks, J.), dated April 25, 2005, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated April 25, 2005, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of assault in the second degree, inter alia, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation for a period of 24 months. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated April 25, 2005.

Michael Sileo, Garden City, N.Y. (Paula Schwartz Frome of counsel), for appellant.

Lorna B. Goodman, County Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Gerald R. Podlesak of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Schmidt, J.P., Adams, Santucci and Skelos, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency ( see Matter of David H., 69 NY2d 792; cf. People v. Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of assault in the second degree ( cf. Penal Law § 120.05). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the Family Court's findings of fact were not against the weight of the evidence ( cf. CPL 470.15). While the testimony of the complainant and his witnesses differed from the testimony of the appellant and his witnesses, the Family Court was in the best position to assess all the witnesses' credibility, as it saw and heard the testimony first-hand ( see Matter of Gabriel A., 12 AD3d 666). Under these circumstances, the greatest respect must be accorded to the determination of the hearing court in assessing the credibility of the witnesses and resolving disputed questions of fact ( see Matter of Jamal V., 159 AD2d 507, 508).


Summaries of

In the Matter of Nicholas A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 4, 2006
28 A.D.3d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In the Matter of Nicholas A.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NICHOLAS A., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 4, 2006

Citations

28 A.D.3d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2534
811 N.Y.S.2d 577

Citing Cases

In re Patricia

05; People v Dandrade, 300 AD2d 502, 503; see Matter of Marcel F., 233 AD2d 442). In any event, viewing the…

In re Mtr. of Masako

In response, the appellant failed to provide a reasonable and adequate explanation for the injury or for her…