From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Mendez v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 22, 2005
21 A.D.3d 1191 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

97071.

September 22, 2005.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Harry Mendez, Dannemora, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.


Petitioner was found guilty following a tier III disciplinary hearing of violating prison disciplinary rules prohibiting unauthorized exchange and unauthorized legal assistance. On administrative appeal, the determination was modified to the extent of dismissing the charge of unauthorized legal assistance. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The detailed misbehavior report and the testimony at the hearing provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Alvarez v. Goord, 17 AD3d 945, 945; Matter of Sanders v. Goord, 275 AD2d 842, 842-843). While the correction officer who issued the report did not witness the actual unauthorized exchange, the record reveals that he gained personal knowledge of the incident by investigating and ascertaining the underlying facts after they occurred ( see 7 NYCRR 251-3.1 [b]; Matter of Howard v. Goord, 9 AD3d 778, 778, lv dismissed 3 NY3d 764; Matter of Bonacci v. Goord, 3 AD3d 639, 639).

We have examined petitioner's remaining contentions, including his procedural claims, and find them to be without merit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Mendez v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 22, 2005
21 A.D.3d 1191 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Mendez v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HARRY MENDEZ, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 22, 2005

Citations

21 A.D.3d 1191 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
800 N.Y.S.2d 858

Citing Cases

Williams v. Goord

Initially, we are unpersuaded by petitioner's contention that the misbehavior report was deficient. Although…

Rivera v. Selsky

We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence in the form of the misbehavior…