From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of McNear v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 26, 2006
25 A.D.3d 1043 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

97786.

January 26, 2006.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Samuel McNear, Dannemora, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur.


A correction officer observed petitioner approach another inmate and exchange punches with him. Petitioner disregarded several direct orders from the correction officer to stop fighting, even when the other inmate attempted to comply with the orders. As a result of the incident, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with fighting and refusing a direct order. At the ensuing tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner requested no witnesses and offered no defense. Petitioner was found guilty of both charges and, as modified on administrative appeal, a penalty of, among other things, six months confinement and loss of good time was imposed.

Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report written by the correction officer who witnessed the incident is sufficient, by itself, to constitute substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966; Matter of Encarnacion v. Goord, 19 AD3d 906). We have reviewed petitioner's remaining contentions, including his challenge to the penalty imposed and tier classification of the charges, and find them to be without merit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In the Matter of McNear v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 26, 2006
25 A.D.3d 1043 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In the Matter of McNear v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SAMUEL McNEAR, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 26, 2006

Citations

25 A.D.3d 1043 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 418
808 N.Y.S.2d 818

Citing Cases

Retamozzo v. Ny. Dept. of Corre. Serv

We find that this is sufficient to allow for judicial review ( see Matter of McCain v Goord, 273 AD2d 571).…

Muniz v. Goord

Following an unsuccessful administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding. The…