From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of McFadden v. Armmitage

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 6, 2003
1 A.D.3d 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

93542

Decided and Entered: November 6, 2003.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of the Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Reginald McFadden, Dannemora, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting threats and violent conduct. As set forth in the misbehavior report, petitioner became aggravated during a medical callout and stated to the nurse that he "will remember when [he] get[s] out of here and kill five more people." Although the nurse involved in the incident testified that the threat was not directed toward her, she nevertheless stated that she was frightened by the incident. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report, testimony at the hearing and petitioner's admission to making the statement provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Jackson v. Portuondo, 288 A.D.2d 733). Notwithstanding petitioner's assertion that the nurse was not the object of the threat, the rule violated prohibits inmates from making "any threat" ( 7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [3] [i]). Furthermore, petitioner's assertions that his statement was taken out of context and the misbehavior report was issued in retaliation for threatening to file a complaint against the medical staff presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Moore v. Walsh, 301 A.D.2d 894, 895; Matter of Perkins v. Goord, 290 A.D.2d 700, 701; Matter of Dabney v. Murphy, 278 A.D.2d 714, 715). We have examined the remaining contentions raised by petitioner and find that they are either without merit or unpreserved for our review.

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In the Matter of McFadden v. Armmitage

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 6, 2003
1 A.D.3d 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In the Matter of McFadden v. Armmitage

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF REGINALD McFADDEN, Petitioner, v. DAVID ARMMITAGE, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 6, 2003

Citations

1 A.D.3d 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
766 N.Y.S.2d 617

Citing Cases

Williams v. Annucci

We confirm. The misbehavior report, the letter authored by petitioner and the hearing testimony provide…

Sorrentino v. Annucci

Initially, the misbehavior report and hearing testimony from the correction officer who authored that report…