Opinion
1999-01567
Submitted December 11, 2001.
January 14, 2002.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, dated March 18, 1998, which, after a hearing, confirmed a determination of the respondent Suffolk County Department of Social Services dated July 31, 1997, denying the application of the petitioner's decedent for medical assistance.
Maryellen Sullivan, Floral Park, N.Y., for petitioner.
Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Robert A. Forte and Thomas B. Litsky of counsel), for State respondents.
Before: DAVID S. RITTER, ACTING P.J., NANCY E. SMITH, THOMAS A. ADAMS, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.
ADJUDGED that the petition is granted on the law, with costs, the determination is annulled, and the Suffolk County Department of Social Services is directed to grant the application for medical assistance.
Pursuant to the Social Services Law, where a child has resided in the parent's home for at least two years immediately before the date the parent becomes institutionalized, and provided care to the parent which permitted him or her to remain at home rather than be institutionalized, the transfer of the home to the child qualifies as an exemption in determining eligibility for medical assistance (see, Social Services Law § 366[c][3][i][D]). In the instant case, the respondents determined that the transfer of the decedent's house to her daughter for below market value did not qualify for this exemption (see, Matter of Giangrande v. Perales, 180 A.D.2d 736, 737). This determination was based on the fact that the decedent's daughter never changed her address with the Department of Motor Vehicles.
The determination should be annulled. The decedent's daughter expressed her intention to live with her mother and care for her indefinitely, and, in fact, lived with and cared for her mother for three years. The petitioner established that such care included assistance with bathing, feeding, personal needs, shopping, cooking, administering medications, supervising visiting nurses, helping with speech therapy, and taking her mother for physical therapy and doctors' appointments. Under these circumstances, the respondents' determination was not supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Cacchillo v. Perales, 172 A.D.2d 98; Matter of Ruiz v. Lavine, 49 A.D.2d 1). Accordingly, the petition is granted, the determination is annulled, and the respondents are directed to approve the application for medical assistance.
RITTER, ACTING P.J., SMITH, ADAMS and COZIER, JJ., concur.