From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Koehl v. Greene

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 23, 2006
26 A.D.3d 719 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

98818.

February 23, 2006.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Edward Koehl, Comstock, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Nancy A. Spiegel of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.


Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule which prohibits altering any document. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Dunavin v. Connell, 20 AD3d 851).

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Koehl v. Greene

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 23, 2006
26 A.D.3d 719 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In the Matter of Koehl v. Greene

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EDWARD KOEHL, Petitioner, v. GARY GREENE, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 23, 2006

Citations

26 A.D.3d 719 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1351
808 N.Y.S.2d 914

Citing Cases

Koehl v. Greene

ow in note 31 of this Report-Recommendation, as well as the following: (1) Koehl v. Darwin, Index No.…