From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Justeen T

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 29, 2005
17 A.D.3d 1148 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

CAF 04-01038.

April 29, 2005.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Cayuga County (Mark H. Fandrich, J.), dated April 1, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The order adjudicated the child neglected and ordered that respondent be placed under petitioner's supervision for a period of 12 months upon the terms and conditions set forth in a service plan.

CYNTHIA B. BRENNAN, AUBURN, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

THOMAS P. STOPYRA, COUNTY ATTORNEY, AUBURN (FREDERICK R. WESTPHAL OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

RICHARD W. GUNGER, LAW GUARDIAN, AUBURN, FOR JUSTEEN T.

Present: Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Kehoe, Martoche and Hayes, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: This appeal from an order dated April 1, 2004 is dismissed, as that order was superseded by an order dated July 20, 2004 ( see Matter of Eric D. [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 1051). We decline to exercise our discretion to treat the notice of appeal as one taken from the subsequent order ( see CPLR 5520 [c]; cf. Kanter v. Pieri, 11 AD3d 912) because the subsequent order was entered upon respondent's consent, and thus no appeal lies from that order ( see Matter of Cherilyn P., 192 AD2d 1084, lv denied 82 NY2d 652).


Summaries of

In the Matter of Justeen T

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 29, 2005
17 A.D.3d 1148 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Justeen T

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JUSTEEN T., an Infant. CAYUGA COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 29, 2005

Citations

17 A.D.3d 1148 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
793 N.Y.S.2d 844

Citing Cases

Smith v. Cashaw

These consolidated appeals arise from a series of proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, in…

Salo v. Salo

We dismiss the appeal as moot because, while the appeal was pending, the parties and the Attorney for the…