From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of John Regan v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 29, 2011
87 A.D.3d 1236 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-09-29

In the Matter of John REGAN, Petitioner,v.Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.


John Regan, Dannemora, petitioner pro se.Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

After correspondence sent by petitioner was returned to the correctional facility where he was incarcerated, it was opened by mail room staff and found to contain a resident index list that included the names and cell locations of other inmates. As a result, petitioner was served with a misbehavior report charging him with possession of contraband, smuggling, refusing a direct order and violating facility correspondence procedures. At a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner pleaded guilty to all charges and the resulting determination of guilt was affirmed on administrative appeal. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. Petitioner is foreclosed from challenging the determination of guilt inasmuch as he pleaded guilty to all of the charges during the disciplinary hearing ( see

Matter of Correnti v. Fischer, 83 A.D.3d 1354, 1354, 921 N.Y.S.2d 720 [2011]; Matter of Hawkins v. Fischer, 72 A.D.3d 1378, 1379, 898 N.Y.S.2d 532 [2010] ). Additionally, our review of the severity of the penalty assessed reveals that it was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness ( see Matter of Phipps v. Fischer, 82 A.D.3d 1396, 1397, 918 N.Y.S.2d 385 [2011]; Matter of Barca v. Fischer, 80 A.D.3d 1038, 1039, 915 N.Y.S.2d 392 [2011], lv. denied 16 N.Y.3d 711, 2011 WL 1643302 [2011] ).

Petitioner's remaining arguments have been examined and found to be without merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

MERCURE, J.P., ROSE, KAVANAGH, STEIN and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of John Regan v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 29, 2011
87 A.D.3d 1236 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In the Matter of John Regan v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of John REGAN, Petitioner,v.Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 29, 2011

Citations

87 A.D.3d 1236 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
929 N.Y.S.2d 887
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 6612

Citing Cases

DeJesus v. Prack

Petitioner contends, among other things, that the determination is not supported by substantial evidence.…