From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Jenkins v. Strough

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 2003
303 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-00386

Argued February 6, 2003.

March 31, 2003.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Trustees of the Freeholders and Commonality of the Town of Southampton, New York, dated February 5, 2001, granting a dock permit to the respondent West Mecox Group, the petitioner David Albenda appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated December 11, 2001, which dismissed the proceeding.

Sonnenschein, Nath Rosenthal, New York, N.Y. (Justin Kattan of counsel), for appellant.

David J. Gilmartin, Jr., Southampton, N.Y. (Kimberly A. Judd of counsel), for respondents Scott A. Strough, Jon S. Semlear, Edward J. Warner, E. Peter Corwith, Eric L. Shultz, and the Board of Trustees of the Freeholders and Commonality of the Town of Southampton.

Michael G. Walsh, Water Mill, N.Y., for respondents West Mecox Group and Sandy Russell Deerfield Green.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, HOWARD MILLER, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

"A [person] whose interest may be adversely effected by a potential judgment must be made a party in a CPLR article 78 proceeding" (Karmel v. White Plains Common Council, 284 A.D.2d 464, 465; see Matter of Artrip v. Incorporated Vil. of Piermont, 267 A.D.2d 457; see generally Matter of Castaways Motel v. Schuyler, 24 N.Y.2d 120). Here, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the proceeding because, had the subject dock permit been annulled, many of the lot owners who had not been made parties to the proceeding may have been adversely effected. Accordingly, they were necessary parties to this proceeding (see CPLR 1001[a]).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the appellant's remaining contention.

SANTUCCI, J.P., SMITH, H. MILLER and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Jenkins v. Strough

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 2003
303 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In the Matter of Jenkins v. Strough

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF NEVITT N. JENKINS, petitioner, DAVID ALBENDA, appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 31, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
756 N.Y.S.2d 867

Citing Cases

Matter of Springer

Imprisonment in such cases is not inflicted as a punishment, but is intended to be remedial by coercing the…

Matter of Farmer v. Farmer

( United States v Mine Workers, 330 US, at p 331, n 4, Black and Douglas, JJ., concurring and dissenting.)…