From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Javeline v. Whalen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 19, 2002
291 A.D.2d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-04426

Argued January 18, 2002.

February 19, 2002.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent, Dennis Whalen, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, dated March 11, 2000, made after a hearing, which found that the deceased was ineligible for medical assistance for a period of 6.803 months because she had transferred assets to the petitioner for less than fair market value within the previous 36 months before applying for assistance.

Stephen Javeline, Port Jefferson Station, N.Y., petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Marion R. Buchbinder and Deon J. Nossel of counsel), for respondent.

Before: GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, THOMAS A. ADAMS, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The deceased, Shirley Javeline, transferred three certificates of deposit worth a total of $70,000, constituting virtually all of her assets, to the petitioner, her son, Stephen Javeline, approximately two weeks after her admission to the hospital for a syncopal episode, later determined to be a transient ischemic attack. One month earlier, she had experienced dizziness.

Approximately two weeks after the transfer, the deceased fell and broke her hip. She also suffered a heart attack. While in the hospital, she experienced a stroke and required long-term care. A few months after the transfer, she was diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, arteriosclerosis, and vascular heart disease.

Given the evidence of the deceased's medical condition at the time the transfer was made and the lack of other evidence showing that the transfer was made soley for reasons other than to qualify for medical assistance, the petitioner failed to justify the transfer of assets (see, Social Services Law § 366[c][3][iii]; Matter of Brunswick Hosp. Ctr. v. Wing, 249 A.D.2d 385; Matter of Carter v. Brandwein, 182 A.D.2d 620).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.

KRAUSMAN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, ADAMS and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Javeline v. Whalen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 19, 2002
291 A.D.2d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

In the Matter of Javeline v. Whalen

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF STEPHEN JAVELINE, ETC., petitioner, v. DENNIS WHALEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 19, 2002

Citations

291 A.D.2d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
738 N.Y.S.2d 370

Citing Cases

In re Loiacono

The petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating eligibility ( see Matter of Gabrynowicz v New York State…

Gabrynowicz v. N.Y. State Dept. of Health

On his behalf, she transferred some of her husband's assets to their son, John Gabrynowicz. Contrary to the…